We Were Never Meant to Reform School.

We Were Meant to Reimagine It.

The author Wendell Berry once wrote: "Our culture is competent to implement almost anything and to imagine almost nothing."

This has always felt like the right way of thinking about how we have gone about “reforming” education in the last 50 years

We have been extraordinarily competent implementers.

We implemented No Child Left Behind. We implemented Race to the Top. We implemented standards and mandates and accountability frameworks and high-stakes test regimes with remarkable efficiency and political will. We doubled down and tightened up and tried harder.

And we have precious little to show for it

Except, as the evidence makes painfully clear, more stress, more burnout, more disengagement, more teachers leaving the profession they loved, more school leaders cycling out, and a generation of students in the grip of an anxiety crisis that should alarm every single one of us.

This is not a reform problem. This is an imagination problem.

What Reform Actually Produced

Let's take a quick look at what “reform” has actually produced:

Linda Darling-Hammond's research on NCLB documented what many educators already felt in their bones: the law's obsession with test score tallies "dumbed down the curriculum, fostered a 'drill and kill' approach to teaching," and drove teachers and students out of public schools. Gains made in the 1990s stalled. Reading declined.

And yet the profound educational inequalities at the root of the crisis were left entirely unaddressed

This is what happens when we confuse measurement with meaning.

Race to the Top promised a different metaphor — movement, aspiration, ascent — but still asked everyone to run the same race from vastly different starting lines.

The finish line was always the same: test scores, graduation rates, college acceptance numbers. The assumption embedded in the policy was that if we could just optimize the outputs, we would have optimized the human beings.

But here is what I believe in my bones:

We cannot optimize our way to flourishing

The Students Who Left — and What They Told Us

Around 2006, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation commissioned a landmark study on school dropouts. What they found should wake all of us up to the deficiencies in “reform”

Nearly one million students drop out every year.

Almost half of all African American, Hispanic, and Native American students fail to graduate.

That’s about ten million students per decade who gave up on school.

The question the researchers asked was why.

The answer wasn't poverty alone. It wasn't underfunding alone. It wasn't that students lacked ability or ambition.

The top two reasons students gave were this:

The curriculum didn't feel relevant to their lives, and nobody seemed to care about them.

That haunts me, and is the driving force behind the work I do to reimagine education as human and communal flourishing

After decades of reform, after billions spent on standards and assessments and accountability measures, the students walking out the door told us they felt unchallenged, unseen, unmotivated, and uncared for.

They didn't leave because the tests were too hard. They left because school had become disconnected from everything that mattered to them.

As one researcher put it, "Most students don't wake up on a single morning and decide to drop out. Rather, dropping out is the end of a long-term process of disengagement."

Disengagement is not a compliance problem. It is a formation failure.

As educators, we can’t always solve the large problems of poverty, resourcing, and politics, but we dang sure can work to get those two things right.

We can and must work with our very lives to make sure we offer students an education worthy of their time and tell them every single day that they matter and are cared for

The Students Who Stayed — and What They're Telling Us

But what about the students who do stay? Surely the system works for them?

Denise Pope, in her essential book Doing School, describes a generation of students who have learned to perform school without actually inhabiting it. They take notes, they memorize, they master the mechanics of grade-getting. They are, in her phrase, "doing school" — a kind of hollow achievement in which the appearance of learning replaces the reality of it.

And the cost is measurable. Anxiety. Chronic stress. Depression.

Janis Whitlock, director of Cornell's Research Program on Self-Injury and Recovery, put it bluntly: "If you wanted to create an environment to churn out really angsty people, modern schooling has done it."

One student in Pope's research described the internal experience this way: "I'm calm on the outside, but inside it's like a demon in your stomach trying to consume you."

These are not struggling students. These are students who are "succeeding."

Which brings me to the most haunting testimony of all. In 2010, Erica Goldson gave her valedictory address at Coxsackie-Athens High School. She had done everything right. Straight A's. Every assignment. Extra credit she didn't need. And standing at the top of her class, she said this:

"I have no interests because I saw every subject of study as work, and I excelled at every subject just for the purpose of excelling, not learning. And quite frankly, now I'm scared."

She was the best student in her school. And she had no idea who she was or what she loved.

The Invitation Before Us

Here, then, is the opportunity and invitation before us: to move beyond school reform and into school reimagination

I am convinced that the problem was never that we needed better reforms.

The problem is that we have been reforming the wrong thing.

Reform assumes the structure is basically sound and just needs adjustment — better tests, higher standards, stricter accountability, smarter incentives.

But what if the structure itself is oriented toward the wrong end? What if we are aiming at the wrong target?

What if school was never primarily about producing test scores or college-ready graduates or career-prepared workers — but about forming human beings capable of knowing who they are, what they love, and how they shape a better world for us all?

That is not a reform agenda. That is a reimagination movement

And I believe it is the only agenda worth our energy.

The evidence keeps pointing in the same direction:

Students flourish when they are known, when the work is meaningful, when there is someone who genuinely cares whether they show up. They wither when they are processed. They disengage when they are managed. They drop out — physically or spiritually — when school asks nothing of their humanity and offers nothing to it.

That is why I am so committed to this work, and why I invite you to move beyond school reform and into the school reimagination work

Blessings on the journey

Scott

My life's work is helping schools become places of human and communal flourishing

Here are a few ways I can help:

>Flourishing School Leader Cohort: This is a monthly gathering of school leaders just like you leaning into hope, meaning, purpose, intention, strategy, collaboration, and community. You can start anytime and get a full year of rich engagement from that point

>1-1 Leadership Coaching: This is where it gets good! We spend 90 minutes each and every month in a deep dive on the hopes, dreams, challenges, and opportunities uniquely related to you as a leader. I come alongside you to provide inspired strategy in an immersive

>Whole School Consulting: A deep, year-long partnership that ignites vision, strengthens culture, galvanizes your community, and transforms your entire school from the inside out. I come alongside you and your team to help walk you towards deeper flourishing for everyone

Six days hiking the glens of Ireland, followed by a year of collaboration with the peers you spent time with on the path. Only 25 spots available. LEARN MORE HERE

Recommended for you